Requirements Checklist: Weekly Cycle Flow
Requirements Checklist: Weekly Cycle Flow
Specification Quality Gates
Completeness
- Full cycle flow defined from scheduling to closeout
- Timing parameters configurable
- Exception paths documented
- Integration with State Authority specified
Testability
- All acceptance scenarios use Given/When/Then format
- Success criteria are measurable
- Independent tests defined per user story
- Timing thresholds are explicit and configurable
Constitution Alignment
§1 Weekly Cadence Invariant
- FR-101: Auto-scheduling ensures every Active user has cycles
- FR-102: Configurable timing supports different anchors
- FR-108: Auto-progression maintains cadence without user action
- Delays are explicit state changes (DeliveryUncertain event)
§2 Circular Inventory Invariant
- FR-106: Scan-based packing ensures accurate tracking
- FR-107: Garments locked at commitment (Reserved state)
- FR-112, FR-113: Inspection required before return to Available
- FR-113: Auto-routing respects lifecycle bounds
§3 State Truth Discipline
- All operations use State Authority for entity transitions
- New entities (SchedulingJob, CommitmentBatch, etc.) support audit
- Variance events documented (CompensatingAllocation, MissingGarment)
§4 Explicit Failure Handling
- US8 covers exception workflows
- Late return escalation path defined (reminder → hold → loss)
- Missing item handling specified
- Carrier loss handling specified
§5 Probabilistic Fit
- Fit intelligence receives actual (not planned) garment data
- Damage reports inform fit learning
- No fit decisions made in this layer (deferred to FitIntelligenceSubsystem)
§6 Cognitive Load Minimization
- Auto-scheduling requires no user action
- Auto-progression through windows requires no user action
- Return reminders are progressive, not demanding
- Default behaviors handle normal cases
Functional Requirements Traceability
| Requirement | User Story | Constitution Reference |
|---|---|---|
| FR-101 | US1 | §1 (cadence), §6 (no user action) |
| FR-102 | US1 | §1 (timing control) |
| FR-103 | US2 | §1 (commitment binding) |
| FR-104 | US2 | §2 (inventory management) |
| FR-105 | US3 | §2 (operational accuracy) |
| FR-106 | US3 | §2 (tracking accuracy) |
| FR-107 | US4 | §1 (batch efficiency) |
| FR-108 | US5 | §1 (auto-progression), §6 (no user action) |
| FR-109 | US6 | §6 (progressive reminders) |
| FR-110 | US6 | §6 (flexibility) |
| FR-111 | US6 | §4 (explicit hold) |
| FR-112 | US7 | §2 (inspection required) |
| FR-113 | US7 | §2 (lifecycle routing) |
| FR-114 | US7 | §3 (accounting accuracy) |
| FR-115 | US8 | §4 (exception paths) |
Dependencies
Depends On (must exist before this feature)
- State Authority Subsystem (entity state management)
- User, Garment, Box, Cycle tables in Airtable
- Transition automations for all entities
Provides To (downstream dependencies)
- Fit Intelligence Subsystem (garment/cycle data for learning)
- User Contract Enforcement (settlement data)
- Observability/Audit (event stream)
Risk Assessment
Critical Risks Addressed
- Cadence collapse → Auto-scheduling + auto-progression + escalation holds
- Inventory drift → Scan-based packing + variance detection
- Late return cascade → Progressive escalation + HoldLogistics
Risks NOT in Scope
- Fit prediction accuracy (FitIntelligenceSubsystem)
- Payment processing details (UserContractEnforcementSubsystem)
- User communication content (ExperienceMinimizationSubsystem)
- Carrier integration details (external API—manual for pilot)
Approval
- Spec reviewed against constitution
- Timing parameters validated with operations
- State Authority integration verified
- Ready for /speckit.plan